Google is changing the way we interact with the internet—again. In an era where users have become accustomed to Google’s familiar list of blue links, the tech giant is now rolling out AI-generated answers at the top of its search pages. These “AI Overviews” aim to provide quick, synthesized responses, offering users the convenience of instant answers without needing to leave Google. However, this shift raises critical questions about the future of the open web, the livelihoods of content creators, and the very essence of search engine optimization (SEO).
Since the introduction of AI Overviews, early reports show that clicks to top-ranked sites have dropped by over 34%, a worrying statistic for anyone reliant on organic web traffic. As AI-generated responses become the norm, is Google’s new search system creating a more efficient browsing experience, or is it quietly diminishing the visibility of the open web?
For over two decades, Google’s search results have provided users with a range of sources in the form of blue links—each one pointing to a website that could help answer a user’s query. However, with the rollout of AI Overviews, this familiar search experience is rapidly changing. Google now synthesizes information from multiple sources and presents it as a single, concise summary at the top of the page. This change is designed to help users quickly find the answers they need, without the need to click through multiple sites.
While the AI Overview feature is being hailed as a convenience, it comes with its own set of challenges. Google’s claim that this feature helps users ask more complex questions and receive high-quality content is valid in some cases. But as AI starts to curate the answers, it raises concerns about depth and diversity. AI Overviews may provide one definitive answer, but it also reduces the exposure of alternative viewpoints or in-depth discussions that traditional search results once offered. Users may not feel the need to visit additional websites or check other sources, even when the AI’s answer is incomplete or wrong.
The rise of AI Overviews has had an undeniable impact on the click-through rates (CTR) of websites. Data collected by Ahrefs reveals a 34.5% drop in CTR for the top organic search results following the introduction of AI summaries. In March 2025, the CTR for Google’s top-ranked pages dropped to just 2.6%, a dramatic fall from the previous 7.3%.
This change represents a significant shift in how users interact with search results. Now, many searches end without users clicking on any of the listed results at all—approximately 60% of searches are now zero-click, meaning users get the answers directly from Google’s AI answers without visiting the original websites that generated the information. For publishers, journalists, and independent creators, this presents a dire problem. Content is being scraped and repackaged by Google’s AI, but these creators are seeing less traffic and fewer opportunities to monetize their work.
SEO (search engine optimization) has long been a guiding principle for content creators looking to drive traffic to their websites. Historically, ranking high on Google’s search results page meant visibility and clicks, which translated into ad revenue and audience engagement. However, the rise of AI-generated summaries means that the rules of SEO are changing. Now, even the top-ranking content can be buried beneath the expansive AI answer box, drastically reducing the chances of getting clicked on.
This shift has given rise to a new phenomenon—Answer Engine Optimization (AEO)—a strategy where content creators are adapting their work specifically to be included in Google’s AI summaries. Techniques such as writing in Q&A format, adding structured data, and explicitly answering common queries are now crucial tactics for those hoping to secure a place in AI-generated responses. The goal is no longer just to rank high but to get picked by the AI to feature in its answer box, a space that can provide instant answers to users, while bypassing traditional website traffic.
One of the most pressing questions raised by Google’s AI Overviews is: who controls the flow of information? Previously, Google acted as an index, pointing users to a range of sources so they could explore different viewpoints and make informed decisions. However, with AI now playing an editorial role, Google is filtering and curating the answers users see before they even click anything. The risk here is that Google’s AI could become the gatekeeper of what information the public consumes.
Moreover, Google’s algorithm predominantly cites sources from the top 10 search results, which may sound like a fair approach to prevent misinformation. However, this narrowing of sources means that minority views, emerging perspectives, and niche blogs are less likely to be included in AI summaries. The result is a more homogenized internet where only the dominant voices get amplified, and diverse viewpoints are pushed to the sidelines.
The growing influence of AI in content discovery is not without its consequences. On the ethical front, there’s a growing concern that AI’s filtering of information could lead to a concentration of power in the hands of a few tech giants, potentially stifling diversity of thought. If only a select few websites dominate Google’s AI Overviews, there’s a real risk that emerging information, minority perspectives, and independent creators will become marginalized.
Economically, content creators face a stark reality: as AI Overviews continue to replace traditional search results, traffic to their websites—and by extension, their ad revenue—is likely to continue falling. As fewer users visit websites directly, many creators will have to find new ways to survive in a world where their content is scraped and summarized without compensation.
Google’s AI Overviews represent a dramatic shift in how we interact with information online. While the new feature offers convenience and efficiency for users, it also raises serious concerns about the future of the open web, the livelihoods of content creators, and the control that tech companies like Google have over the discovery and distribution of knowledge. As AI continues to play a more dominant role in how we find information, it’s crucial that we consider the broader implications on diversity, accuracy, and open access to the web. The next few years will determine whether AI can enhance the web or ultimately diminish its role as a platform for free and open exchange.